I think not but I will leave it to my readers (and if it comes to it to a judge and or jury). I encourage you to chime in with your comments to what your think happened. I, for one, would love to see the reactions of both LEOs (current and retired) and non-LEOs to this arrest but please if you do reply do it respectfully.
An off duty Houston PD officer claims a man pointed a gun at him twice while in a gas station and arrested the guy at gunpoint. The guy claimed his gun fell out of the side panel of his vehicle as he rushed out of the vehicle to go to the rest room. Sounds like a pretty lame story, on the guy's part, doesn't it! It seems that there may be evidence that the officer was the only one violating rules or regulations. What it says near the end of the article makes me wonder if anything else, other than the guys gun, influenced the officer to make that arrest. Well, watch the video at the below link. THEN and ONLY THEN, read the accompanying article. http://www.khou.com/news/local/man-claims-he-was-wrongfully-arrested-for-pointing-gun-at-off-duty-officer/126858009 I watched the video about 20 times, and froze it almost as often at the point where the guy's right hand moves over the steering wheel as he exits he vehicle. I did that mostly to look at the 'suspect's" right hand to see if it was holding a gun. I cannot see a gun in that hand. The door latch was evidently in his other hand. Thus I did not see any chance for the 'suspect' to have pointed his gun at the officer once as he exited his vehicle, let alone that he got out of the car holding it and pointing it at the officer, then dropped it, then picked it and again pointed it at the officer (as the article says is claimed in court documents). To me, it sure looks like what the 'suspect' said happened is what really happened. What do you think?
On the other side, maybe the cop actually saw it or maybe he truly believes he saw it that way after the fact of it really having been otherwise. What I mean is that maybe he did not see the gun pointing at him but as the guy picked it up the officer's mind played a trick on him. It happens, and in the current state of affairs with all the anti-cop sentiment in this country (real or imagined), maybe he saw it that way. Of course, it could be he is just rabidly anti-gun for non-law enforcement and lying his arse off - who can tell. A video from another angle might show that when the guy picked it up, it was pointed at the officer but the video we can watch, at the provided link, sure does not seem to support the claim. The claim reportedly was that the guy pointed a gun at the officer as the guy got out of his vehicle, then dropped it, then picked it up, then pointed it at the officer again. Once more, I just don't see that in the video. So, is there anything else, even something possibly just hinted at in the report, something that possibly could have influenced what the officer saw?
I have to wonder about the actions of the officer right before the incident since he reportedly was shown, in the store video, buying beer just before it happened. I don't think they meant root beer. If buying beer is it also it possible he had also drinking before the incident? It certainly would be something for the PD, if truly being objective, to look into. Had he been drinking before the incident it could put this in a whole new light.
Regardless of whether he was drinking or not, what goes against the officer, besides the video and the statement of the guy who was arrested, is the reported violation of departmental policy/regulation for buying beer while in uniform. If he can violate one regulation, as was reported, then why not another. This possibly will all be brought to the jury's attention, if it goes to trial, in the form of a rebuttal to any testimony by the officer or as a way to discredit the officer's integrity. I will guess that, in the absence of any other video evidence or witnesses, if this goes to trial by jury, the 'suspect' will be exonerated of an assault charge or any lessor charge related to pointing a gun at the officer.
Of course, if the 'suspect' has prior conviction and lied on his permit application that will go against him and his integrity; however, that already seems to have been addressed in as much as it was reported that those charges had been dismissed. Then again, that is giving a lot of credit both to the media and to the defense attorney. I mean, when have attorney's or the media ever gotten it wrong, right!
However it winds up, it goes to show you need to really give some thought to where your gun is located, why it is there and if it could be better positioned. It may also well go to show that if you are a LEO, you really need to be sure of your probable cause before making an arrest and before swearing to it in court or on an affidavit and you had best follow departmental policy instead of being seen violating it immediately prior to an arrest. All the best, Glenn B
Scroll down through the Blue Zone to read my disclaimer, find out more about me, find contacts for government officials, get some basic information about our most cherished national documents, discover ways to help support U.S. Troops overseas, and to find links to help you learn about the Flag of the United States of America.
Use of any information or advice that I supply or to which I link is done at your own risk. Your use of my blog, in any manner, is your consent to hold me harmless and indemnify me and other sources mentioned herein, from any claim(s) against me, or those other sources, said claim(s) arising directly or indirectly from your use of this blog or any content therein or linked to it, or arising from your passing on of information from this blog to any party and their use or passing on of it ad infinitum.
Furthermore, unless specifically stated, the photographs on this site may have been taken by others and belong to others; however, I do not knowingly use copyrighted materials without the owner's permission. If I find a photograph on the Internet, that I want to repost and it has no attribution of copyright on it, I use it in good faith as an image in the public domain. If you are the owner of that photograph and have a problem with me using it, notify me of the copyright and I will remove it at once. In such instances, please note, there was no way for me to know it was copyrighted material if you did not mark it so.
ZOMBIES & ME
As for zombies - bring em on! I am ready to shoot em down or knock down depending on which type are they. The pic is of the shoot em down type but click on it to see the knock em down type.
ME BEYOND ZOMBIES
A Not So Secret Location In The Not So Free World, New York, United States
Scroll Scroll down through The Red Zone to find links to: my blog rolls, firearms advocacy groups, firearms forums, online firearms and ammo dealers, firearms interest & reference sites, my other online interests, fonts of knowledge (news media and reference), and to my moth-balled rants.